The synopsis for this grant opportunity is detailed below, following
this paragraph. This synopsis contains all of the updates to this
document that have been posted as of
updates have been made to the opportunity synopsis, update information
is provided below the synopsis.
If you would like to receive notifications of changes to the grant
me change notification emails
The only thing you need to provide for this service is your email
address. No other information is requested.
Any inconsistency between the original printed document and the disk
or electronic document shall be resolved by giving precedence to the
Modification to Previous
Funding Opportunity Number:
Jan 17, 2013
Feb 21, 2013
Original Closing Date for Applications:
Mar 18, 2013
Current Closing Date for Applications:
Mar 18, 2013
May 14, 2013
Funding Instrument Type:
Category of Funding Activity:
Expected Number of Awards:
Estimated Total Program Funding:
Rural Health Research Centers
Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement:
City or township governments
Special district governments
Independent school districts
Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized)
Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
Additional Information on Eligibility:
Applications may be submitted by any domestic public or private nonprofit entities including: faith-based and community-based organizations; State governments and their agencies such as universities, colleges and research institutions; hospitals; local go
Health Resources & Services Administration
This announcement solicits applications for the Rural Training Track Technical Assistance (RTT-TA) Demonstration Program. RTTs are family medicine residency programs with a particular focus on training physicians who will practice in rural communities. The purpose of this new competitive announcement is to provide national support and policy analysis for this unique model of rural-focused allopathic and osteopathic physician family medicine residency training.
The RTT-TA demonstration program strongly encourages the formation of a consortium of entities to continue to delineate the policy challenges that RTT residency programs face in training family medicine physicians. This cooperative agreement is an ongoing activity that builds on the work of a previous RTT demonstration (HRSA-10-192). This project will work to identify and analyze the key policy issues, challenges and barriers that continue to affect these rural training sites, and will provide technical assistance where appropriate to increase the number of family medicine residents who train in RTTs. The lead organization is a critical component to ensure the success of this project and must demonstrate a proven track record, with extensive prior experience and results in working with RTT programs. For the purpose of this cooperative agreement, the Office of Rural Health Policy (ORHP) is defining a rural training track as a family medicine residency that operates as a “1-2 program.” In these programs, the first year of training is completed at central, usually urban sites and the last two years are completed at rural community-based training locations. The expectation is that the RTT-TA cooperative agreement supports RTTs that train family medicine resident graduates of allopathic, osteopathic, or both types of medical school institutions.
This demonstration requires an ongoing partnership and a collaborative relationship with ORHP in the selection of projects and in the development and implementation of the activities submitted in the work plan. The overarching goals are:
1) Support new and existing RTT programs by providing direct technical assistance when requested, including as appropriate a thorough assessment and specific recommendations related to financial sustainability;
2) Increase medical student interest in RTT residency programs by marketing the RTTs to the right audiences, providing residency interview assistance for students and spouses/partners when needed, and increasing the RTT National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results for these programs;
3) Expand the number of RTT programs by working with communities and academic institutions who desire to start new programs by sharing the expertise of RTT faculty veterans. This includes assisting new programs in successfully achieving academic accreditation and qualifying for Medicare graduate medical education funding. Particular attention should also be given for infrastructure enhancement, such as providing financial assistance for purchasing medical textbooks, journals, electronic resources, and/or educational equipment needed for the residency program.
4) Analyze the specific characteristics of new versus existing programs in terms of viability/sustainability and analyze which interventions of this cooperative agreement prove most effective in enhancing long-term program viability. This is discussed further on page 30 in the “Final Report” section.
The focus areas to achieve these goals include the following:
1) Identifying, analyzing and translating the key policy issues and challenges affecting the ability of RTT rural training sites to attract potential family medicine residents, including the implications that Medicare and Medicaid regulations have on the viability of RTTs;
2) Supporting policy meetings around rural health workforce, training, recruitment and retention issues for rural residency directors, rural health researchers, rural medical educators, rural medical students and policymakers;
3) Providing technical assistance to new and established RTT programs. Possible examples of technical assistance and activities could include mentoring of new and established RTT programs to increase their fill rate, curriculum development, peer mentorship between RTTs, working with any consortium members to develop strategies to recruit medical school graduates to RTT programs, maintaining an assessment of the match and fill rates for RTT Programs and building a network of all the RTT programs;
4) Identifying and promoting best practices for RTT programs to increase their viability by identifying successful models and administrative support strategies, as well as planning how technical assistance will be primarily focused on the community-based sites of the RTTs;
5) Conducting an inventory and developing a narrative of the different RTT programs nationwide, with a particular emphasis on comparing new versus existing programs related to characteristics such as financial underpinnings, revenue sources, number of residents, faculty and community champions, unique challenges related to the RTT model, sustainability strategies, etc. All new programs implemented from January 1, 2013 through July 31, 2016 should be included in this analysis. Special attention should also be given to analyzing the reasons for any program closures that occur during this time frame; and
6) Maintaining an accurate assessment of the success rates (NRMP and July fill rates) for RTT programs and the long-term rural practice retention rates of their graduates.
The following files represent the modifications to this synopsis
with the changes noted within the documents. The list of files is
arranged from newest to oldest with the newest file representing the
current synopsis. Changed sections from the previous document are shown
in a light grey background.